David Pogue goes rogue..writes.."reading pixels instead of reading print" in the New York Times....edging closer to calling screen-reading by new word

David Pogue going rogue... writes...."reading pixels instead of reading print" in the New York Times....edging closer to calling screen-reading by a new name, not screening, he will never call it screening, but the fact that he said "reading pixels instead of reading print" means that he gets it, and in ten years he will accept a new word for "reading pixels" and it won't be reading anymore. Patience. Reading pixels is not the same as reading print. David Pogue said that! David? explain yourself!

www.nytimes.com